![]()
Map of Nigeria showing Yorubaland [google.com.ng]
Dear Mrs Adenle,
In answer to your request for opinion on Lee Kuan Yew’s story of how he transformed Singapore, I’ve had a glance at the two volumes of Lee’s memoirs; I’ve also considered how he transformed Singapore after becoming the first prime minister in 1959, and remaining in power until 1990. The transformation of Singapore from a Third World to a First World country—led for three decades by Lee himself, and now by his eldest son Lee Hsien Loong—is a significant achievement given the fact that the country has no natural resources. This transformation, influenced by the country’s official nation-building ideological pillars, particularly multiculturalism and meritocracy, provides a useful lesson for the socioeconomic quandary facing Nigeria.
There is however, however. Looking at extreme longevity in power of Lee (Prime Minister for 31 years, Senior Minister from 1990 to 2004, and “Minister Mentor” since then until 2011 when he stepped down from the cabinet), including the patient grooming of his son for the Premiership, the Singaporean government system may be classified as dynastic, if not oligarchic. Besides that, during Lee’s time in government, economic liberalism coexisted with political illiberalism, such as detaining without trial hundreds of “prisoners of conscience’’ and Communist sympathizers (a total of 661 between 1960 and 1976, but 188 in 1963 only). Although smashing ofopponents so ruthlessly with all the sledgehammers that the state possessed has been justified as necessary to create a stable state and viable economic regime, does it mean then that authoritarianism pay? There is no easy answer.
Singapore’s disregard for certain standards regarding human rights, coupled with the country’s economic progress, may seem to have confounded theorists of liberal democracy, but the general assumption is that as prosperity and economic freedom increase in a country, so too will political freedom. I agree that in spite of Singapore’s illiberal, one-party rule—since 1997 only two opposition members had been in Parliament at any given time, though the number was increased to six in 2011 after the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) lost a record 6 seats out of 87 contested)—Singapore has managed to produce an efficient administration and spectacular prosperity. But at what cost? Again, at the cost of an authoritarian style of government that sometimes infringed on civil liberties. In this context, should Nigeria then look hook, line, and sinker to Singapore for an example of how to combine authoritarian-style rule with the elevation of the nation’s economy? A note of caution.
Let me recall the draconian policies of the Buhari-Idiagbon regime. In order to bring Nigeria an efficient administration and enduring prosperity, the regime embarked on repressive measures, refusing to ‘tolerate’ what one of its chieftains called ‘undue radicalism.’ So,in a manner of Lee’s approaches and styles of governance, the right to differ had to give way to ‘national’ efforts aimed at salvaging the faltering Nigerian economy through a ‘War Against Indiscipline.’ However, not long after, the regime was overthrown. Perhaps if the regime had remained in power (for how many years?) like Singaporean’s, the situation could have been different from now. One can read Lee’s experience as justifying such repressive measures, but it appears conditions in Singapore are different from conditions in Nigeria.
Agreed, Singapore, like Nigeria¸ is multi-ethnic and multi-religious. But it looks like it is much more easier for people to live in relative harmony in Singapore (Population: 5.3 million (UN, 2012)), a city-state (like Monaco or Vatican City) which functions as a single metropolitan, than in Nigeria (Population: 166.6 million (UN, 2012) with about 250 languages and dialects and nearly as many ethnic groups, coupled with deep religious differences.
Given the above scenario, the question arises whether the interests of Nigeria will best be served by regional exploitation or national development. It has been said repeatedly that Nigeria is not yet a nation. Mr (later Chief) Obafemi Awolowo, speaking in London on 13 March, 1956, expressed what could have been the view of the whole nation, yet it had a regional appeal. “We Nigerians are in a hurry. We realise that we have been left behind in the race for economic and social progress.” For me, rather than bothering ourselves with the persistent call for the convocation of national conference to determine the course of the country’s future development, I think it is better, in the words of Prof Soyinka at South-South Economic Summit in Asaba in April 29, 2012, to “let each regional grouping with compatible ideas of the ultimate mission … begin to call the shots, and relegate the centre to its rightful dimensions in any functioning federated democracy.”
AO Ajetunmobi.
Dear Dr. Ajetunmobi,
Thank you v. much for taking the trouble not only to look at my overview of Lee’s two-volume story of the Singapore success story but for taking the time and trouble to actually get hold of the books, and with a glance-through, afford us an in-depth appraisal of the good and bad of the Singapore story.
First of all by the way, I think the world is dangerously at a stage that sees dynastic rule spreading even though it may not be that apparent as it’s often couched under democratic presentation. Till today, I continue to marvel at how Bush 2 became president – or even governor for that matter!
It’s very apparent that there’s no one-size-fits-all form of government due to various differences but I also believe that Singapore’s success story offers a template that can be tweaked here and there for developing countries that are often plagued – especially in Africa – with ethnocentric divisions, corruption, lack of focus, etcetera, to achieve varying levels of success in governance. The ongoing small transformation in Southwestern Nigeria and a few pockets in the country are, if truth be told, governors seeing what Fasola first achieved in Lagos and how the people’s appreciation of his effort made it impossible to dislodge him from getting a second term. Ondo State indigenes, by the same logic, solidly supported Mimiko to remain their governor because of what he has achieved NOT because he belongs to the Labor Party but through his achievements, a fact I have long stated on this blog.
I believe that the Fasola standard may be a little difficult to attain because of lack of resources just as the Singapore success may be difficult for developing countries to replicate due to population sizes but it does show that a reasonable level of good governance is attainable for all with a focused, selfless leadership that can [sort of] cherry-pick its way using its own peculiar needs and resources.
I look forward to getting others’ contributions.
TOLA
It is true that Nigeria is not on the same pedestal with Singapore in terms of population, the diversities in our tribes and dialects, and of course the classification of Singaporean style of governance; dynasty, which suggests or supports Lee Kuan Yew’s long term reign and the ascension of his son to the county’s leadership.
But there is a lesson to be learnt by the developing countries which in effect, is at par with Nigeria of 2013.
LKY himself had given a clearer picture of the driving force and I think it is the crux of the lesson to be learnt:
“The quality of a nation’s manpower resources is the single most important factor determining national competitiveness. It is the people’s innovativeness, entrepreneurship, team work, and their work ethic that gives them that sharp keen edge in competitiveness.”
He emphasizes the importance of knowledge in economic transformation but also rejects the classical separation between scholarship and entrepreneurship. “Those with good minds to be scholars should also be inventors, innovators, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs; they must bring new products and services to the market to enrich the lives of people everywhere.”
Most developed countries begin with investing on the citizens. Empowering and engaging everybody by allowing an environment to blossom talent and entrepreneurship so that they can supplement the lives of people within the community. I will dwell on how investing on people have made a great deal of American citizens, then come home by putting Nigeria on the spot vis-a-vis the obtainable situation at present, our pains and collective desire.
Some forty years ago in Ohio USA, bright pupils from the ages of 5-8 whose noted bias for science, were encouraged to study medicine with specialty on Cardiology. Twenty five years after, the state through Cleveland Clinic was acknowledged worldwide as the center for ‘heart repair workshop’. Kanu Nwankwo, a Nigerian and a retired soccer professional was diagnosed of heart problem shortly after USA 94 World Cup tournament, his heart was repaired at Cleveland Clinic. Many rich personalities from all over the world visit for consultation on any cardio- related issues. Interestingly, Cleveland Clinic is all over the state up to almost every count,y and who can ever imagine the revenue that is being generated by this citizens’ empowerment!
The motto of Ohio State used to be “The Heart of it all” but now, it is “Birth Place of Aviation’ (because of the Wright Brothers) and it is the cheapest place to learn any aviation related profession. In Ohio State, every county has at least one airport to her name. At Lorain County Joint Vocational School, (like the Trade Centers of old) you can train to be a helicopter pilot for less than $500 and in within 6 months! Yours sincerely is considering training on becoming a pilot by this fall.
The State of Wisconsin is “American Diaryland”. The State is known for milk and cheese products, so large enough to feed America! Indiana is “Restart Your Engine”. They live by motor racing! The best and world class championship is annually staged in Indianapolis.
California is “The Golden State” where everything is business and entertainment and truly, it lays the ‘golden eggs’ for America!
Research has shown that most of today’s inventions come from young fertile minds. The 12 year-old Briton whose designed apps were sold at over $100m to Google started his computer hi-tech exploits at age six. Some young lads were celebrated last week for using urine as alternative to power a cell phone!.
Citizens’ empowerment and participation utilizes individuals in the community for decision making and influencing the institutions and programs that affect them. This form of practice employs the skills and talents of citizens to meet the collective goals of the community.
Richard and Oracene Williams watched a tennis championship where they found out how much was paid to the match winners. They decided to have ‘just one more kid’ to play tennis. They had Venus and again came her sister, Serena. Their dad introduced them to tennis at 3, and by the time Venus was turning 15, she became a pro and today, has won seven Grand Slams!
The opposite is obtainable in Nigeria. Nigerian governors borrow money on behalf of the citizens for infrastructural developments when they are not sure they would win the next election. This would in turn bring tolls of taxation on the citizens when the burdens to pay back the loans are getting hot! Just some minutes ago, a friend in Lagos posted this on his facebook timeline “Lagos! Ruthless IGR (internally-generated revenues) generation is killing jobs. Reduce the arm-twisting and let small businesses grow jobs. Give us a break!! Get creative!!”
As justifiable as it is to borrow money to build roads, schools, beautify ‘round-about’, hospitals etc it is absurd and counter development if more than half of the same citizens whose cars are to ply the roads cannot even afford to buy cars let alone fuel it. Of what use is it, if graduating students of the demolished, rebuilt and reformed buildings can only boast of overall National mere 6% successful grades? Same schools that are ‘infrastructurally-developed’, demolished and rebuilt have no plans for libraries and those that do, are showcasing a carcass and an empty shelves.
Borrowing to build a shopping Complex when the majority of the citizens are artisans and farmers is more of a misplaced priority than being innovative. Didn’t the Yorubas say “inu ni a ma nfo, ki a to f’ota (you need to feel good inside before you look good outside).
Donald Duke was a good example of a leader who was empowering the community. He invested into tourism and entertainment and was making his state a tourism revenue-generating enterprise. He succeeded in highlighting his state on the map of the world among places worth visiting for vacation.
Imagine if Ondo invests in the school of Agricultural Economics with the high-tech of 2013 research, where all conceivable agro-processing studies are comparable only with the western world.
Osun State where Ila Orangun is noted for their citizens’ versatility in Palm Wine is worthy of economic focus. Start a Winery endeavor where indigenes would be proud of their heritage by popularizing the wine compared only to world class! School of Winery could be so innovative and revenue-generating enough such that the pride of the citizens would be incredibly rewarding from generation to generation!
Lagos State could be the Las Vegas and California of Nigeria, a city of technology invention of Africa, by instituting a center for computer novelty and creation.
My point is creating the environment for learning to improve the lives of the citizens is more beneficial than building mega cities, which as it is, could only be s’agbe l’oju yoyo but has proven not to last. People build cities and not cities build people; so therefore, developing people comes first, then infrastructures for long-lasting benefits to the community present and generations yet unborn. Investing in the people guarantees the future and prospers the nation in the long run.
Even if we are not under a ‘dynasty’ as it is under LKY and Singapore, our chosen form of government guarantees ‘government of the people by the people’ if only our leaders allow participation from us all in decision- making. For example, Donald Duke spent 8 years as the governor but if the community agrees to the new direction he charted, continuity by succeeding leadership would take them to the Eldorado. But when decision to embark on a project on behalf of the community is not participatory and collective, the likelihood that it will endure beyond the current serving leadership is low.
In conclusion, hear LKY “There is no reason why third world leaders cannot succeed…if they can maintainsocial order, educate their people, maintain peace with their neighbors, and gain the confidence of investors by upholding the rule of law.”
Nigerian leaders score 15% in all these highlighted qualities!
Sadly, just as we ask for understanding and economic-focused leadership, sincere followership too is not there, eniyan otito ti tan, t’iro l’oku, t’oda’le l’oku.
http://www.technologyandpolicy.org/2013/01/30/development-learning-from-singapores-lee-kuan-yew/
Deleola Daramola
Thanks, Dele, and a good day to us all.
A point I’d like to correct which I did not when Dr. Ajetunmobi mentioned it in his first contribution is that LKY’s son did not take over from him; his then deputy, Goh Chok Tong, who was one of the leaders of the miracle in Singapore, would lead the country for 14 years from 1990 to 2004 before Lee’s son, Loong, then already 50, and after extensive education, was Minister for many years before he became Prime Minister. And if truth be told, continuity could be a great thing as apparent in the case of Singapore. Imagine the cut-throat fight over re-nominations and re-elections in Nigeria IF it was possible to, say, get even a single term of ten years!
As mentioned in my first submission to this discussion group, how did George Bush qualify to rule the world’s most powerful country? I also did mention briefly that ”the world is dangerously at a stage that sees dynastic rule spreading even though it may not be that apparent as it’s often couched under democratic presentation”. I believe we can tag dynastic rule to Singapore just as the United States where a third Bush could rule the U.S.within a period of four decades; two Clintons within two decades, two Clintons at the Senate within a decade (Chelsea, Bill & Hillary’s daughter is said to be “weighing” political options) … And how about the past: the Adamses, the Roosevelts as presidents, and if not assassinations and Late Ted’s bad habits, the world could have seen two or three Kennedys as presidents.
Senator Hillary Clinton is not just an astute politician but she was an accomplished and brilliant attorney but it was her husband’s presidency that gave her a spring board. George Bush 2 and Jeb Bush became governors of different electoral-vote rich states (Texas and Florida) using Bush I presidency as springboards; neither has records of brilliance. Worse, George 2 was AWOL at his paramilitary (Coast Guard) service, a fact that was buried as the political machinery was used to steamroll him to the Republican nomination over more qualified McCain & others.
And out West right now in big electoral votes California is Jeb Bush’s son – don’t want to bother myself googling to find his name – already being touted for “big things’ in politics – read that “presidency” via the Senate or govenorship of Cali. Moving to big states in the United States and with “eyes on politics” means only one thing: eye on the presidency because California, New York, Texas and Florida hold huge electoral votes which are used to calculate presidential election victories. Do the math, as the saying goes in good ol’ USA!
Oligarchic rule seems inevitable in our present world where big money drives politics. Even in a Nigeria rapidly becoming feudalistic, Our Thieves At The Top – “Oga At The Top” – have stashed so much money away that the political process can never produce anything better than oligarchy. How did Daisy Danjuma become a Senator when her husband was Defence Minister? How about other women, including one who reportedly claim a then head of state as her guy – not her word but I cannot go that earthy!
Let’s face it: Singapore is partly a success because of the continuity of being ruled by three heads of state since independence. Of course diluting the gene pool – so to say – would be ideal but the system has worked for Singapore where its citizens are not being repressed and have attained one of the world’s highest living standards by a system that does not allow indiscipline.
Nigeria can use leaders like Singapore has had but it ain’t going to happen with a few people holding billions of U.S. dollars in stolen wealth which is freely used to pervert a system that has but tottering steps.
TOLA.
Dear Dele,
This is the reply to your contribution as I merely used my last mail to examine the important point of dynastic rule which is in the early part of your mail and considering the fact that Dr. Ajetunmobi also touched it in his. I wanted to get that off as I knew I needed steady and good access web period to work on that while I could send replies to Fatai’s and yours later as they would not be long!
It is a very good contribution that touched very important points that contain useful information that should be especially useful to the Southwest. I mention our regional area because we stand a good chance of moving the region forward than moving Nigeria. It is a small unit with even smaller units where a bit of the Singapore Success Story can be replicated.
By the way, I do not think we should forget that even though Singapore has a small population, it was plagued by ethnocentric divisions that resulted in acts beyond mere superficial competition for control but riots and even killings before LKY devised neutralizing his own settler Chinese majority and putting the Malay ethnic minority at par with others . We must not forget that even at state levels with no more people than Singaporeans, there are deep divisions in some of the Yoruba States.
Once our governors can show the people in their various states that a common, well-focused people-centered interests are paramount and not any self-serving grandiose projects, the fruitless and clannish competitions would give way to group interest.
TOLA.
I’m not receptive to the idea that Singapore’s experience should be carried to the nth degree. There is not a single path to modernity.The consensus of earlier opinions was that the key ingredient of Singaporean economic success – a culture of innovation and experimentation – should be adapted in light of our own culture and experience in Nigeria, perhaps more appropriately, in Yoruba-controlled states. The Western-educated Singapore’s patriarch, Lee Kuan Yew, after all, adapted Confucian value system to the existing Western formats. As he has stated in an interview with Fareed Zakaria in Foreign Affairs, such an adaptation was more appropriate to East Asia’s Confucian cultural traditions than was the Western democratic model. (Fareed Zakaria “Culture Is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew,” Foreign Affairs 73(2) (1994): pp. 109-127).
Again, authoritarianism, as I’ve stated before, is less “functional” than democracy. Under it, national decline is caused most fundamentally by sclerosis. The series of scandals, in the year 2012, involving top officials of Singaporean government and prominent personalities, including two senior civil servants who were arrested and charged with corruption for granting government contracts in exchange for sexual favours, and another fifty-one prominent individuals who were charged for procuring commercial sex from an underage girl, seem to provide a confirmation of the premises of that theory.
Perhaps it was because of these scandals that the Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced, late last year, a National Dialogue, headed by Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, with some twenty-six members drawn from many different backgrounds, to engage a broad spectrum of society and identify their preferences and concerns regarding the national development process. Lee even went on to hold a television forum called “A Conversation With PM Lee” in September with fifty guests. No doubt, there are attractive and unattractive features in Western-style democracy. But the recent decision to announce a National Dialogue in Singapore, after years of experimentation with “soft” or paternalistic form of authoritarianism, which combined capitalism with an authoritarian political system, underscores my point about the need for us to grow more selective in the adoption of Singaporean story.
AO Ajetunmobi.
Prof.,
Thanks for this.
There is nowhere in the notes of Fatai, Dele or myself that adoption
of the Singapore story as a template “to nth” or any “degree” was
suggested; anyway, even if any of us suggested that, we do not have
the power to enforce it – so to say1 I even used the term “cherry
picking” our way to see which is best for our situation. Ditto Dele.
Tola.
Clarity and understanding of Singapore’s model for economic and political dynamism can only contribute to better-informed decisions. I’m grateful for the clarification. As a peroration, Lee Kuan Yew, however, is so fascinated with culture; he explains in the interview I referred earlier how Confucianism underpins the economic and political development of Singapore. If culture is so important, then countries with very different cultures may not, in fact, succeed in the way that East Asia country did by getting economic fundamentals right. But then, like Singaporean people, we (I mean Yoruba ethnic group in particular) also have a culture that places much value in learning and scholarship and hard work and thrift and deferment of present enjoyment for future gain. In taking a cue from Lee, we can encourge the immersion of our people in Yoruba notions of culture (asa); tradition (ise); religion (esin); character (iwa); language (ede); and faith/belief (igbagbo), to guide morality, determine ethos, and regulate political-economic undertaking in our society.
Best regards
AO Ajetunmobi
Ever since this Singapore Story began, a lot of thought-provoking revelations have taken place. As I said somewhere, Singapore’s story as narrated in the two books, is a good recommendation to read, digest and put the principles into practice by the third world leaders, especially Nigeria.
The write-up of Dele and your comments on it, are another exposition that need to be commented on.Your comments made me remember a topic I was taught in chemistry at the University – The Ideal Gas. No gas can ever be ideal as all gasses tend to attain the Ideal Gas situation as there are parameters to be fulfilled. No gas has been scientifically proved to attain the situation.
Some of us in diaspora and a good number of our people back home assume the advanced democracies as Ideal in nature, and hence the use of these democracies as yard sticks. Despite the fact that their Rome was not built in a day, they went through a lot of metamorphosis before reaching where they are today, yet they have not and will never reach the ideal situation because of flaws in human parameters. One of them is what you brought out about the Bush and other families.
Oligarchy is everywhere. It becomes prominent and a form of taboo in governance as a result of too much corruption, indiscipline, nepotism, arrogance and other vices. These are at their lowest levels in advanced countries, but in third world countries, they are the songs of everyday. If those in government, especially in third world countries learn to respect and give people their dues, all these hues and cries will be at the barest minimum.
Hypocritically, the leaders are the ones showing off their wealth in Churches and Mosques, while they do not follow the teachings in the Holy Books as to their duties towards those they govern. A disciplined leader will command the respect and followership of an equally-disciplined society or nation. Though, we may not have an ideal society, yet we will always be heading towards it all the time once we have the right leadership at the helm at every level of governance.
Fatai Bakare
Thanks, Dear Fatai.
I agree with you that we tend to be in too much of a hurry but then again we must remember that nature has helped us leap-frogged stages that others spent a long time to pass through before they arrived at where they now command respect. With Nigeria’s oil money, you’ll agree with me that we should not be where we are right now. Accountability is what is needed to ensure there’s a fear of doing the wrong thing. And our Yoruba tradition and heritage of working to leave a good name seems now lost.
TOLA
Since I have an idea of where this discuss could end, I might as well just articulate my take once again.
I built my earlier posted essay on a contemporary account of Lee Kuan Yew’s thinking as told through a series of interviews: Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master’s Insights on China, the United States, and the World, by Graham Allison and Robert Blackwill.
“The quality of a nation’s manpower resources is the single most important factor determining national competitiveness. It is the people’s innovativeness, entrepreneurship, team work, and their work ethic that gives them that sharp keen edge in competitiveness.”-LKY
“Enriching the lives of the people everywhere” is a direct result of “people’s innovativeness, entrepreneurship and team work”. The people are able to build their community because the community has built them. Simple, invest in the people and the people will develop their environment. The fast developing nations send their wards overseas for training with the basic aims of catching on the returns of exposed specialists in their country’s various developmental demands. According to the Canadian government, 3,546 Japanese students (not to mention other Asian countries) required a study visa in 2011, up from 3,238 in 2010. Same with Chinese student’s application for visa to the USA to the tune of over 1 million! Yearly, statistics has shown that foreign students in the USA are about 14 million of which half of them are of Asian origins. The point is you don’t have to look further for why these Asian countries; China, Japan, Malaysia, India, Korea (North and South) and even Russia are on the fast track while African countries are economically, socially and politically creeping.
Some Nigerian states are competing on how much they can borrow to build infrastructures. While I will, and have never said that building roads, bridges, power transmission and telecommunication etc. is bad, I have a greater concern that the cart is being put in front of the horse. Citizens are being neglected for the race to showcase “achievements while in Office”. “Infrastructure is probably the single most important need for Africa to develop,” said Stephen Hayes, president of the Corporate Council on Africa, a group that promotes U.S.-Africa commercial ties. I bet that the position promoted by this fellow is business oriented than people well-being. Most aids and support that developing countries get are laced with business intentions. That is the point LKY was making. That is the lesson and difference between our Nigerian leaders and LKY. Hear him: “Those with good minds to be scholars should also be inventors, innovators, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs; they must bring new products and services to the market to enrich the lives of people everywhere.” In other words: It’s fine to be a scholar but you must go out there to learn as inventors, innovators so that you can start manufacturing new products here to improve the lives of every Singaporean! Isn’t that awesome?
Foreign investors and contractors are building our bridges, dredging our water fronts, roads etc. Singaporeans built their infrastructures by themselves, their oil rigs, refineries and business strategists are Singapore nationals without having to look onto USA for economic direction. Nigerian manufacturers are Indians, Chinese and other nationals who are willing to swim in the corruption laden business tide. A governor in Nigeria, desired IT based learning gadgets for his state’s students, all he could think to do was to go outside for the purchase of the gadgets while in another breadth, promised to re-locate the manufacturing plant to the state “so that will also create job opportunity for the community”. What rational? Didn’t he know that the business entity is owned by foreigners whose only interest is to do business thereby enriching their community’s economy back home? The machineries (most likely a loan from their local bank), expertise and materials are sourced from outside from an outside fund, which of course would be paid back, not by Naira, but with their currency after making the money in Nigeria! He had forgotten about the Federal and State Universities funded by tax payers’ money that are right there on his nose in the state. Couldn’t he have chosen a group of academia and IT patrons from the universities’ IT department to design and come up with an enduring educational IT gadget if it is that necessary as a tool to learn in his state?
My Point again:
Let us invest in our people simultaneously as we do on infrastructures.” Eniti o nko ile, ti ko ko omo, tani ko mo pe omo naa ni yio gbe ile naa ta“? He who builds a house but refuse to build his child would end up having the child selling the house”. We only can move ahead in development like it is obtainable in Singapore if we innovate and invent. In a developed society, institutes develop programs of any sort to make life easy for themselves. You can obtain up to a Doctorate degree in Shoe-Making, Carpentry, Welding etc.
Ifo in Ogun State can invest in Sugar Cane Research such that the product could be used for energy, drug and medicine, household plastic and industrial usage and any other conceivable after products. No organic product is seasonal in America, just like corn is all year round, so also sugar cane could be in Ifo. It the simplest agro utility that man can ever discover to fight hunger and poverty.
Ogun, Osun and Owena rivers can be dredged and utilized for picnic boat rides for vacation and excursions. Prospective tourists all over the world and within can then feast on this ‘first of its kind’ invention in Nigeria. Hotels and leisure centers can stretch between these states to be funded by private and corporate enterprises. A few weeks ago, some tourists and I on summer treats drove our cars into a boat (it was awesome to seat in my car and be ferried on a water trip) and we alighted at an Island for a 30 minutes boat ride. The boat travels back and forth every 30 minutes and all aboard fun seekers to the Island were having jolly times. I later got home wanting to know more about the Island, “Put in Bay” (see, the name suggests that the water was put in bay so it could be useful for business) so as to evaluate the business endeavor. It is a whopping $2 billion per annum business estate by three states and a country: Ohio, New York, Michigan and Canada.
We can be creative if we; the leaders and the led are ready to look inward by soul-searching; build people today or keep borrowing to build mega city to massage political egos. The choice is ours.
Deleola Daramola
Dele,
Thanks for bringing views beyond the two books on which this got started.
It is true we have not even start to scratch the surface of tourism in Nigeria. The river system in Nigeria – at least the SW – is so vast that the short boat rides and such are do-able. The Ogunpa Channel as it was used to conjure a place like San Antonio where a minor river snakes its way and on its banks are located eateries, etcetera. And there’s hardly any major U.S. city where there aren’t variations of dinner cruises, lunch cruises, etcetera. On the Oslo River in Norway, there is a cruise with only sandwiches served but you’d hardly want to eat on the Oslo Fjord as the boat cruises leisurely with the sun fighting the approaching nightfall on a summer eve at past 9.30 p.m.!
Regards,
TOLA.
I can understand why Madam has high praise for Lee Kuan Yew, and why she is so ardently enthusiastic of Singapore success story as to urge Nigerian leaders (and ourselves too) to, at least, leaf through Lee’s memoirs, and then act accordingly. Take for example, Deng Xiaoping, the reformist leader of the Communist Party of China who, after Mao’s death led China towards a market economy, made his first and only visit to Singapore in 1978. What he saw on that visit, as reported in the Forbes (Jul 15, 2013, p. 1) changed the course of economic policy in China. Deng was so inspired that when he returned home, he decided to form four special economic zones, which he opened to foreign investment and world trade. These zones prospered, and more were subsequently opened and today China is better off for that singular visit. Although Lee’s new book, One Man’s View of the World, is yet to come to hand, having drilled down to Singapore global economic milestones, as highlighted below, I could see that Lee’s emphasis on “competent government” and “social cohesion” is very essential when it comes to governing a country to success. That, no matter the size of the country, honest and dedicated leaders can only produce honest and dedicated citizens and that, for such a country, the sky is the limit, no matter what the odds.
Highlights of Singapore Global Economic Milestones:
· One of the world’s top three oil export refining centres;
· World’s 3rd largest oil and oil products trading hub;
· World’s busiest transhipment port and 2nd busiest port in terms of total shipping tonnage;
· Singapore accounts for 10% of the world’s wafer starts and 40% of the global hard disk media are manufactured there;
· Singapore is the largest manufacturer of jack-up rigs, commanding 70% of the world market;
· Singapore has 70% of the global market for the conversions of the floating production storage offloading units;
· Singapore is recognised as a ‘Global Hydrohub’ with more than 70 companies in a vibrant water industry ecosystem;
· Singapore is ranked by the World Bank as the No. 1 logistics hub amongst 155 countries globally in the 2012 Logistics Performance Index;
· Leading aviation hub in Asia-Pacific, contributing more than 25% of the region’s maintenance, repair and overhaul output.
AO Ajetunmobi
Prof.,
Thanks for taking another look.
My regards,
TOLA.